APBnow.org

All Points Bulletin 9

Welcome
APBnow
Democracy
Casualties 1
Casualties 2
Culpable
Think about it
Police Brutality
Elements of Police Brutality A
Elements of Police Brutality B
All Points Bulletin 1 Police Batons
All Points Bulletin 2 Handcuffs
All Points Bulletin 3 Pepper Spray
All Points Bulletin 4 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 5 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 6 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 7 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 8 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 9 Taser Thoughts
All Points Bulletin 10 Grieving a Loss
All Points Bulletin 11 Stunning Jesus!
All Points Bulletin 12 Arwen Gun
All Points Bulletin 13 Bearcat
He didn't do anything!
The Neil Stonechild case
The Rodney King case
Toronto police force
Ontario Special Investigations Unit
"Policing the Police" by Andre Marin
Memorials
Alternatives/ Final Words
Taser silent protest
In Memorium /Taser-related Deaths in Canada
Contact Us/Links

Taser Thoughts

by D. Lee Oliver

There is a significant need for an intermediate police tool or weap-on, as in exceptional circumstances where the use of a baton or gun would be considered impractical, ineffective or unwarranted. 

  • Do Tasers kill? There is no actual proof that they do. But surely all, or a vast majority of the twenty-six taser-related victims in Canada would have survived the encounter with the police had they never been tasered in the first place. So my answer to this is obvious.

  • I often hear police say that Tasers "save lives." Perhaps inadvertently, in that the Taser is safer than, say a firearm, in that it has a lesser likelihood of killing the suspect. An absurd reasoning.    

  • The vast majority of victims were unarmed. Has a cop ever been killed by an unarmed antagonist? A cop's life has never been saved by using a Taser on someone who is unarmed.

  • If these deaths were firearm-related and not Taser-related, there would be chaos and violence on our city streets in anarchistic proportions. 

A two-year study conducted by the Canadian Police Research Centre recently examined several use of force methods used by officers found that batons caused a higher rate of injury than Tasers. The study scored Tasers high in safety for both officers and suspects, noting only 1 percent of suspects subdued with the weapon required hospitalization, and 87 per cent suffered only minor injuries or weren't hurt at all. (1 percent and 87 percent equals 88 percent. What happened to the other 12 percent?) 
 
Batons, on the other hand, injured 39 per cent of subjects and resulted in the hospitalization of three per cent. (Attempts to refrain from inflicting serious injury should always be considered. Again, these actions rest entirely upon the attitude of the officer. Although I do not always support the use of batons, I cannot recall a recent death attributed to their use; as opposed to the 26 taser-related deaths in Canada thus far.)   
 
Tasers are often responsible for preventing death and serious injury because they can subdue a suspect quickly, one of the study's co-authors, Calgary police Staff Sgt. Chris Butler. "The longer a confrontation is allowed to go on, the much more unpredictable the outcome will be," Butler said. (I wonder how much more unpredictable a situation could become, if it was prolonged. But I can predict one thing; the possibility that a life could be saved.) 

And now for some good news. Some of the newer products being tested are promising. Non-lethal weapons such as the "pain ray," which sends a beam of energy that heats a person's skin to a hundred and thirty degrees. Also, a magnetic audio device that uses magnets to transmit loud sound up to a mile away. 

It is the position of APBnow that Tasers be banned from police use in Canada and the United States.    

Note: I wrote to Calgary alderman Diane Colley-Urquhart recently, about some comments which she had made to the media, in favor of Tasers. I wanted to address the issue with her. She did not respond.

Ban
Tasers
NOW!

scan10041.jpg
Against Police Brutality NOW!

  

APBnow.org