APBnow.org

The Neil Stonechild case

Welcome
APBnow
Democracy
Casualties 1
Casualties 2
Culpable
Think about it
Police Brutality
Elements of Police Brutality A
Elements of Police Brutality B
All Points Bulletin 1 Police Batons
All Points Bulletin 2 Handcuffs
All Points Bulletin 3 Pepper Spray
All Points Bulletin 4 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 5 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 6 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 7 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 8 Tasers
All Points Bulletin 9 Taser Thoughts
All Points Bulletin 10 Grieving a Loss
All Points Bulletin 11 Stunning Jesus!
All Points Bulletin 12 Arwen Gun
All Points Bulletin 13 Bearcat
He didn't do anything!
The Neil Stonechild case
The Rodney King case
Toronto police force
Ontario Special Investigations Unit
"Policing the Police" by Andre Marin
Memorials
Alternatives/ Final Words
Taser silent protest
In Memorium /Taser-related Deaths in Canada
Contact Us/Links

scan10124_1.jpg

Saskatoon police lose bid to quash Stonechild inquiry
Top court declines to review findings

Two Saskatoon police officers and their union have failed in their final attempt to defeat the damning conclusions of a 2004 inquiry into the freezing death of Neil Stonechild, a 17 year-old aboriginal youth. 
The Supreme Court of Canada declined yesterday to hear an appeal by Constables Larry Hartwig and Brad Senger and the Saskatoon City Police Association, who accused the inquiry of treading on forbidden ground.
the appellants had hoped to make the case that Mr. Justice d. H. Wright, the inquiry commissioner, violated his proper role by naming names and broadly hinting at criminal responsibility in the case.
Mr. Stonechild disappeared Nov. 24, 1990-a bitterly cold evening. Five days later, his body was found in a field outside Saskatoon. An autopsy showed he died of hypothermia.
The inquiry concluded the youth was in Constable Hartwig's and Constable Senger's patrol car the last night he was seen alive, and that injuries and marks on his body were likely caused by handcuffs.
While the report did not conclusively find that the former constables were responsible for dropping off Mr. Stonechild in the field where he died, they were cited for failing to follow proper procedures and for failing to tell investigators into his death that he had been in their custody.
Despite their consistent denials that they had never so much as seen Mr. Stonechild on the night he died-let alone confined or abondoned him outside the city-the two officers were dismissed from their jobs within a day of the report being released.
Last year, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal rejected a bid by the officers and their association to overturn the findings. The court ruled that the commissioner did not exceed the scope of his authority by naming individuals, nor did he violate the Constitution by making findings of civil or criminal liability.
"Findings of fact, of course, will frequently indicate that the specific individuals are at fault in some way," Mr. Justice Robert Richards wrote in the ruling. "However, this in itself is not sufficient to warrant circumscribing the work of inquiries. The efforts of most commissions would be largely pointless if they could not involve findings about what went wrong and why."  
Neither officer has ever faced criminal charges in the matter.
The report condemned the Saskatoon Police Service for not conducting a proper investigation. It said senior officers were defensive and attempted to protect their reputations to the detriment of the inquiry. 
In September, 2007, the case took a bizarre turn when a career criminal testified during a police commission hearing that  Mr. Stonechild was murdered to prevent him from testifying at a gun trial.
However, after hearing the evidence, a three-person panel of the Saskatchewan Police Commission ruled it was too unreliable to be used as evidence at Constable Hartwig and Constable Senger's appeal of their dismissal from the force.
The decision to deny leave to appeal was made by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, Mr. Justice Morris Fish and Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein.
 
This article was written by Kirk Makin and published in the Globe and Mail.   

 
 
A very tragic ending for this young man. It is almost unbelievable. When I think of the extent to which a Goon is willing to commit acts of intended sadistic harm, my thoughts are of Neil Stonechild and the frightening, tragic situation he was placed in, in what were the last few hours of his life.
 
D. Lee Oliver
 

scan10041.jpg
Against Police Brutality NOW!

  

APBnow.org